|


















| |
|

|
County
of Inyo
Board
of Supervisors |
BUDGET HEARINGS
The Board of
Supervisors of the County of Inyo, State of California, met in special session
to consider the FY 2002/03 Budget, at the hour of 8:10 a.m., on Monday,
July 22, 2002, in the Board of Supervisors Room, County Administrative
Center, Independence, with the following Supervisors present: Chairperson Linda Arcularius presiding, Julie Bear, Ervin R.
Lent, Carroll M. Hambleton, Jr., and Michael Dorame. Supervisor Lent provided the Invocation, and
Supervisor Hambleton led the Pledge of Allegiance.
|
|
|
|
Public Comment
|
The
Chairperson announced the public comment period and there was no one
wishing to address the Board.
|
|
Budget
Message
|
The County Administrator presented the FY
2002/2003 Budget Message. He
provided a brief history of the requirements for adopting a budget and
reviewed the priorities identified in his message.
Mr. Mendez highlighted areas of interest and concern, including
 |
·
reallocation of Coso money from Special Reserves to
General Reserves; |
 |
·
the uncertainty of the State Budget impacts; |
 |
·
the proposed 10% reductions to last year’s
Grants-in-Support funded amounts, noting that the Bishop Chamber of
Commerce had requested less than the 10% reduction would have been and
so he was recommending the lower amount which was the requested
amount; |
 |
·
the reductions in travel and general operating expenses
in all budgets; |
 |
·
the elimination of equity and reclassification requests
because of the impending Countywide classification study; |
 |
·
the urgent and immediate need to replace equipment in
the Solid Waste Program; and |
 |
·
his recommendation that the difference between the fund
balance used and the final fund balance, which will be determined
after the close of the accural period, be placed in contingencies
thereby maintaining a higher contingencies balance than in the past. |
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The
Chairperson recessed the budget hearings at 9:00 a.m., reconvening at 9:35
a.m., with all Board Members present.
|
|
Budget
Message
|
The County
Administrator continued his budget message presentation.
He presented the Board with additional requests for the Budget
which included restoring reductions to Yucca Mountain, District Attorney
RAN and the CHDP budgets for purchases.
He noted that a letter had been received from Child Care Connection
asking to be exempted from the 10% decrease in their Grants-in-Support
request due to the fact that they had not requested increases in the past
several years. He also
identified a correction to page eleven of his budget message explaining
that the amount of “$139,145 million” as the DWP Contribution should
be “only” $139,145. The
Board and Mr. Mendez discussed the need for prudent budgeting in light of
long-term impacts which are imminent because of the State’s $24 billion
deficit.
Supervisor
Hambleton explained that because of the current State budget situation, he
was prepared to make a motion to adopt the County Administrator’s
recommended budget with the expectation that detailed discussions on the
specific requests made by Department’s would take place if feasible
after the State Budget adoption. Supervisor
Bear concurred indicating that she did not feel it would be prudent
time-management to conduct full blown budget discussions at this time, and
then turn around and have similar budget discussions, which would more
than likely have different outcomes, once the impact of the State Budget
is known.
Moved by
Supervisor Hambleton and seconded by Supervisor Bear to approve the County
Administrator Recommended Budget for FY 2002/2003 as submitted and amended
to include the increases to Yucca Mountain, RAN and CHDP Budgets as
requested; and schedule Final Budget adoption for August 27, 2002.
Prior to
the vote being taken on the motion, the Chairperson queried the Board
Members on their desires to hear from the Department Heads and noted the
1:00 p.m., schedule for discussion on the Advertising County Resources
Budget. The individual Board
Members indicated, that while they were willing to hear what the
Department Heads had to say, they were not likely to support any changes
or additions to the County Administrator’s Recommended Budget, at this
time. The Chairperson, after explaining that it was within
the purview of the Chair to set a motion aside in order to take comments,
set the motion aside to be revisited at the conclusion of the discussions.
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The
Chairperson recessed the budget hearings at 10:15 a.m., reconvening at
10:35 a.m., with all Board Members present.
|
|
|
The
Chairperson invited the Department Heads to address the Board concerning
their budgets. She
acknowledged the Department Heads in the order in which their departments
appeared on the Agenda Schedule. The
Department Heads present addressed the Board to concur with the County
Administrator’s recommendations, with several of them indicating that
they were looking forward to more in-depth discussions of their budget
requirements during final budget adoption.
The County
Administrator went on to explain that he was, and would be, recommending
that should, at final adoption, the State still not have a budget, the
Board adopt the CAO’s Recommended Budget with no major changes or
additions. He explained that
this would result in the Board addressing future changes to the budget
through individual Department requests, which would require 4/5’s vote
for passage. He also
explained that the reductions made to the individual budgets were not of
such magnitude that the Departments could not maintain operations to
mid-year, at which time changes could be made to the budgets.
He reminded the Board that in the past, Inyo County conducted
almost full blown budget hearings during the mid-year budget review.
He explained that even thought the County has moved away from this practice, there is nothing
prohibiting the detailed revisions to the budget at that time. He qualified his remarks by explaining that after the Final
Budget is adopted, all future budget actions, whether through individual
requests or a mid-year budget review process, would require a 4/5’s vote
for passage.
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The
Chairperson recessed the budget hearings at 11:45 a.m., reconvening at
1:15 p.m., with all Board Members present.
|
|
Advertising
County Resources
|
The County
Administrator reiterated his previous remarks explaining that his
recommendation for the Grants-in-Support funding was to fund those
organizations at 10% less than their last year’s actual funding
allocation, with the exception of the Bishop Chamber of Commerce, which
was being funded at this year’s requested amount which is less than the
10% reduction of last year’s amount.
Mr. Mendez also explained that should he make recommendations
during final budget adoption to restore some of the funding cut from
Department budgets, he would not be recommending that the
Grants-in-Support programs receive any additional funding.
The Board and Mr. Mendez discussed this recommendation, with Mr.
Mendez confirming that while he would not be recommending restoration of
the funding levels, the Board could make whatever adjustments they chose
to approve.
The
Chairperson invited the representatives to the Grants-in-Support
organizations to address the Board. Representatives
of the County’s Chambers of Commerce addressed the Board to provide
project updates and, in some instances to provide additional explanation
and justification for no reductions to their funding or for increased
funding.
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The
Chairperson recessed the budget hearings at 2:45 a.m., reconvening at 3:00
p.m., with all Board Members present.
|
|
Advertising
County Resources
|
The
Chairperson invited the remaining representatives of the Grants-in-Support
organizations to address the Board. Representatives
of those organizations other than the Chambers of Commerce, who receive
funding through Grants-in-Support addressed the Board to provide updates
and justification for no reductions to their funding.
At the
conclusion of the organizations presentations, the Board and Mr. Mendez
discussed the recommendation to possibly raise the TOT tax in Inyo County.
Mr. Mendez explained that an increase in TOT would be presented
during an upcoming workshop and that
he was envisioning tying the increase to possibly pay for the upgrade to
the Sheriff’s Emergency Network and then to replacing the equipment at
the landfills. Mr. Mendez
explained further that he was tying it to the emergency and visitor
services arenas similar to what recently occurred in Mono County, when
voters approved an increase in the TOT rate.
The Board
and Mr. Mendez went on to briefly discuss the revenue projections for TOT,
TUT, Sales Tax, and Property Tax, with Mr. Mendez explaining that he had
adopted a very conservative estimate policy when projecting these
revenues. The Board and Mr.
Mendez continued to discuss the economic status of the County as a result
of the market drop and the lack of investor confidence in private
industry. Supervisor
Arcularius cautioned departments and Grants-in-Support organizations that
while recommendations may be forthcoming, from the County Administrator or
the individual Board Members during Final Budget adoption, to restore
funding levels, that she, as one Board Member, has increasing reserves as
her first priority. She
explained that in the past couple of years and again this year that money
was being moved from one reserve account to another reserve account
without actually increasing the total amount of reserves.
She went on to explain that she wanted to see the County’s
reserves increased, especially in light of future budget impacts as a
result of the State’s budget crisis.
At the
conclusion of the economic discussions, Mr. Mendez and the Board discussed
alternative dates for scheduling Final Budget adoption because of the
Board and Staff travel schedules. September
10, 2002, was the date agreed upon.
|
|
Budget
Adoption
|
The
Chairperson asked that the motion for adoption be restated. Moved by Supervisor Hambleton and seconded by Supervisor
Bear to approve the County Administrator Recommended Budget for FY
2002/03, as submitted and as
amended to include the increases to the Yucca Mountain, District Attorney
RAN and CHDP Budgets; authorize the County Administrator to sign all
Grants-in-Support Contracts upon adoption of the Final Budget; and
schedule Final Budget Adoption for Tuesday, September 10, 2002, in the
Board of Supervisors Room, at the County Administrative Center, in
Independence. Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
Policy
Discussions
|
The Board
and Mr. Mendez went on to discuss several policy recommendations which
were identified throughout the budget.
Mr. Jewett reviewed the recommendations regarding the Bishop
Airport. Supervisor
Hambleton asked for clarification on where the “loan payment” from
IMAAA to the General Fund was reflected in the Budget, reminding the Board
that several weeks ago the Board had approved an action to “loan”
money to the IMAAA Program which would be paid back.
He asked that the detail for General Fund “loans receivables”
be compiled for the past five years and presented for Board discussion and
possible direction. Mr.
Mendez and Mr. Holland, Auditor-Controller, provided brief explanations of
General Fund loans, with the County Administrator explaining that he would
present the detailed report prior to Final Budget adoption.
The Board
directed Mr. Mendez to bring back for further consideration
recommendations for (a) increasing the Transient Occupancy Tax; (b)
replacing equipment in the Solid Waste Program; and (c) tracking,
reporting and collecting General Fund “loans receivables.”
|
|
Adjournment
|
The
Chairperson adjourned the budget hearings at 4:13 p.m.
|
______________________________________
Chairperson,
Inyo County Board of Supervisors
Attest: RENÉ
L. MENDEZ
Clerk of the Board
by:
___________________________________
Patricia
Gunsolley, Assistant
|