|


















| |
|

|
County
of Inyo
Board
of Supervisors |
The Board of
Supervisors of the County of Inyo, State of California, met in regular session
at the hour of 9:15 a.m., on Tuesday May
13, 2003, in the Board of Supervisors Room, County Administrative Center,
Independence, with the following Supervisors present:
Chairperson Michael Dorame presiding, Julie Bear, Ted Williams, and
Carroll M. Hambleton, Jr. Supervisor
Linda Arcularius was absent. Supervisor
Dorame provided the Invocation, and Supervisor Hambleton led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
|
|
|
|
Public Comment
|
The
Chairperson announced the public comment period and there was no one from
the public wishing to address the Board.
|
|
County Dept. Reports
|
The
Chairperson announced the County Department Report period. Ms. Andrea Clark, Acting Planning Director, addressed the
Board to announce that the County has been awarded the CDBG Grants for
projects in Darwin and Tecopa and for a countywide revolving loan program.
The County Administrator reminded the Board that Senator Maze would
be in Bishop on Thursday, May 15, 2003, to conduct a Town Hall Meeting.
|
|
Yucca Mnt./DOE Update
|
Mr. Bill
Lupton
of the Department of Energy updated the Board on the Yucca Mountain
Project and activities.
|
|
CAO-Personnel/ Leave
|
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by
Supervisor Hambleton to authorize a leave of absence without pay for the
period of May 17, 2003, through June 9, 2003, in accordance with Article
808(a) of the Inyo County Personnel Rules and Regulations.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
|
H&H-Hlth. Serv./ HIV Program MOU and Contract Amendments
|
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by
Supervisor Hambleton to approve Amendment No. 3 to the Contract and
Amendment No. 1 to the MOU between the County of Inyo and the State of
California Department of Health Services for HIV/AIDS Education and
Prevention Programs, increasing the funding by $1,000 for a total not to
exceed $210,700 for the period of July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2004,
contingent upon the Board’s adoption of future budgets; and authorize
the Chairperson to sign. Motion
carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
|
H&H-Behavioral Hlth. Serv./ Change in Hallis Contract
|
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by
Supervisor Hambleton to a) cancel the Contract between the County of Inyo
and Maxwell and Hallis, LLC, for accounting, reporting and consultation
services effective February 28, 2003; b) approve the Contracts between the
County of Inyo and Hallis, LLC, for these services in an amount not to
exceed $1,300 for the period of March 1, 2003, through June 30, 2003, and
an amount not to exceed $7,000 for the period of July 1, 2003, through
June 30, 2004, contingent upon the Board’s adoption of a FY 2003/04
Budget; and c) authorize the Chairperson to sign.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
|
H&H-Behavioral Hlth. Serv./NNA Contract Amendment
|
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by
Supervisor Hambleton to approve Amendment No. 1 to the FY 2002/03
Negotiated Net Amount Contract between the County of Inyo and the State of
California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, for prevention and
treatment programs, increasing the amount of the Contract by $6,544 for a
total of $536,156; and authorize the Chairperson to sign. Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius
absent.
|
|
|
P.W./Diaz Lane Plans and Spec.
|
Mr. Jeff Jewett, Public Works Director, provided
additional information on the Diaz Lane Resurfacing Project.
He explained that the project is on the Bishop Reservation and
informed the Board that during a review of the documents the Department
had become aware of a Bishop Tribal Ordinance which implements the Tribal
Employment Rights Ordinance (TERO) for projects conducted on the
reservation.
Mr. Jewett explained that TERO entitles the Tribe
to collect a percentage of the project amount as a fee for conducting
business on tribal lands and sets in place language for giving Native
American preference in hiring for these projects.
He went on to explain that when a tribe enacts TERO, the tribe is
then allowed the enforcement of a federal regulation which requires TERO
compliance when federal money is funding projects on or adjacent to
reservation lands. Mr. Jewett
went on to say that through the research conducted on TERO it was learned
that Caltrans does comply with TERO and he has been unable to ascertain
under what legal requirement Caltrans complies with the TERO directive.
He said Caltrans’ compliance appears to be a policy choice rather
than a legal mandate. Mr. Jewett clarified his concerns regarding the
County adhering to TERO, citing it would be precedent setting with respect
to other County projects, the County would be giving up a portion of the
project control and, it may require hiring practices to which the County
cannot legally comply. Mr.
Paul Bruce, County Counsel, in responding to questions from the Board,
confirmed that the Diaz Lane project is being performed on a County
right-of-way, which was granted by the Bureau of Indian Affairs in the
early 1950’s and as such the project is being performed on County
property. In response to
questions from the Board, Mr. Jewett confirmed that he had conversation
with the Tribal Administrator, who had informed him that he would need to
discuss this issue with the Tribal Council prior to commenting.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Mr. Jewett reiterated his
conclusion that TERO did not apply to this project, recommended that the
project proceed as designed and, indicated that he would advise the Tribal
Administrator of the Board’s decision regarding the project.
Moved Supervisor Hambleton and seconded by Supervisor Bear to
approve the Plans, Special Provisions and Bid Documents for the Diaz Lane
Resurfacing Project and authorize the Public Works Director to advertise
for bids for the Project, and direct the Public Works Director to inform
the Tribe of the Board’s decision.
Motion
carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The Chairperson recessed the regular meeting at
9:55 a.m., reconvening at 10:05 a.m., with all Board Members present,
except Supervisor Arcularius.
|
|
Ord. 1063 Zone Reclassification 2002-6/Jasper
(Uncle
Bud’s Restaurant)
|
The
Acting Planning Director reviewed the Staff Report and recommendations
regarding Zone Reclassification 2002-6/Jasper (Uncle Bud’s Restaurant).
On a motion by Supervisor Hambleton and a second by Supervisor
Williams, Ordinance 1063, entitled “An
Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Inyo, State of
California, Approving Zone Reclassification No. 2002-6/Jasper (Uncle
Bud’s Restaurant) and Amending Ordinance No. 943, the Inyo County Zoning
Ordinance, by Reclassifying a 7,253 Square Foot Piece of Property Located
at 120 South Main Street in the Community of Big Pine from C-1-10,000
(General Commercial and Retail - 10,000 Square Feet Minimum) to
C-1-10,000-MH (General Commercial and Retail - 10,000 Square Feet Minimum
- Mobilehome Overlay),” was adopted: motion unanimously passed and
adopted, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
Planning/Public Hearing on Tract Map 137 Amendment
|
The
Chairperson opened the public hearing at 10:10 a.m., to consider a
proposed ordinance entitled “An Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Inyo, State of California, Approving Amendment No. 1 to
Tract Map No. 137, Increasing the Buildable Area of Lot 3, and Providing
an Access Easement Across Common Property as Indicated in Exhibit A.” The Acting Planning Director reviewed the Staff Report and
recommendations and at the conclusion of her remarks, asked that the
report be accepted into the record and it was marked Exhibit A.
There being no one from the public wishing to speak to this issue,
the Chairperson closed the public hearing at 10:13 a.m.
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by Supervisor Bear to
waive the first reading of the Ordinance and schedule 10:05 a.m., on May
20, 2003, in the Board of Supervisors Room, at the County Administrative
Center, in Independence as the time, date and place for the enactment.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
Planning Dept./ Darwin Road Abandonment
|
The
Chairperson opened the public hearing at 10:15 a.m. to consider a proposed resolution entitled “A Resolution of
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Inyo, State of California,
Declaring Its Intent to Vacate Portions of Howard Street, Main Street and
an Unnamed Alley in Darwin Townsite and Setting and Providing Notice of a
Public Hearing on Said Vacations.”
Ms. Adeana Fansler, Planning Department, reviewed the Staff Report
and recommendations. At the
conclusion of her remarks, Ms. Fansler requested the Staff Report be
accepted into the record and it was marked Exhibit A.
The Clerk of the Board requested that correspondence received by
the Board be accepted into the record and marked: a letter dated March 21,
2003, from Mr. Jim Hunolt accompanied by a petition signed by Darwin
residents opposing the proposed road abandonment was marked Exhibit B and
an undated letter received today from Deborah Levin of Darwin supporting
the project was marked Exhibit C.
Ms.
Kathy Goss, representing the Darwin Community Services District (DCSD)
addressed the Board to oppose the road abandonment, citing concern with
DCSD access to their water lines being restrained. She asked that a DCSD letter dated December 16, 2002, to
the Planning Department, identifying the District’s concern, be accepted
into the record and it was marked Exhibit D.
During her discussion Ms. Goss asked the Board to look at a map
entitled “Distribution Layout,” which was not entered into the record.
Ms. Goss also requested that copies of photographs of the road be
accepted into the record and the six copies were marked Exhibit E.
Mr.
Joe Haveson, Darwin Resident, addressed the Board to oppose the road
abandonment and to request that the County take responsibility to maintain
the road. Mr. Haveson addressed concerns with the loss of access to and
through Lucky Jim Wash. The
Acting Planning Director, Ms. Andrea Clark, provided additional
clarification on the project parameters.
She confirmed that a portion of the project is to abandon a County
right-of-way, which is a dirt road, which is the southern most portion of
Main Street, adjacent to the applicant’s property.
Ms. Clark explained that the proposed actions are consistent with
the County’s General Plan and will provide for orderly and controlled
growth in the Darwin area. Ms.
Clark also confirmed that with regard to concern about access to DCSD
water lines, that the application provides for an utility easement which
is attached to the land and will remain in effect in perpetuity.
Mr. Jim Hunolt addressed the Board to oppose the portion of the
project, which will abandon a part of Main Street and requesting the Board
approve the application deleting only that road abandonment.
The
applicant, Ms. Burma Reese, read into the record a letter dated May 13,
2003, to the Board of Supervisors, supporting her application.
Ms. Reese asked that the letter be accepted into the record and it
was marked Exhibit F. Mr.
Don Reese, Darwin Resident, addressed the Board to support the
application, explaining that he thought the road abandonment encompassed
only 40 ft. of the County’s right-of-way.
The Acting Planning Director clarified that the application is for
the total 80 ft. Mr. Larry
Krause, Darwin Resident, asked that a decision regarding the road
abandonment be deferred until after the work on the water system
improvement project has been completed.
The Board, Staff and the various members of the audience continued
to discuss the Road Abandonment. At
the conclusion of the conversation, the Acting Planning Director,
suggested an alternative which would be to abandon 40 ft. of the
County’s right-of-way, thereby leaving 40 ft. of access and directing
that the conditions of approval include language which would ensure that
whatever portion of the abandoned right-of-way is needed for the utility
easement be included. The
Chairperson recessed the public hearing at 12:00 p.m., reconvening at
12:02 p.m., with all Board Members present, except Supervisor Arcularius.
The Board and Staff continued to discuss the alternative
recommended by Ms. Clark, with the applicant and those in the audience
opposing the 80 ft. road abandonment agreeing to the compromise. Ms. Clark informed the Board that the Staff Reports and the
posting notices will encompass the change, but that there is no change to
the verbiage contained in the resolution declaring the Board’s intent to
take action on the application.
Moved
by Supervisor Hambleton and seconded by Supervisor Bear to declare the
Board’s intent to abandon a 40 ft. portion of the County’s 80 ft.
right-of-way identified in the Staff Report marked Exhibit A and known as
Main Street, and to approve Resolution No. 2003-22, entitled “A
Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Inyo, State of
California, Declaring Its Intent to Vacate Portions of Howard Street, Main
Street and an Unnamed Alley in Darwin Townsite and Setting and Providing
Notice of a Public Hearing on Said Vacations.”
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
BofS/Mule Days Security Funding
|
Mr. Ross Corner, representing the Mule Days
Committee, provided additional information and further justification for
the request for a $2,000 County contribution to the Mule Days Celebration
security efforts. He
explained that the insurance carrier who had been covering the event for
the last 12 to 14 years, had chosen to not renew the policy this year
because of increased security concerns.
And, instead had required the Event Organizers to submit a new
insurance application, which had resulted in an increase of about $5,000.
Mr. Corner assured the Board that while there are no terrorist
threats associated with this year’s Mule Days Celebration there is a
need to address the concerns associated with the increased costs for
insurance. Mr. Corner and the
Board discussed the Celebration’s ability to cover the costs.
Mr. Corner explained that an article in the Inyo Register regarding
the County’s grant for terrorism preparedness had precipitated the
request. He explained that as
a responsible member of the Mule Days Celebration Committee he felt it was
incumbent upon him to seek alternative funding to offset the increased
costs if it was available. Mr.
Corner confirmed that he had not requested help from the City of Bishop
nor the Chamber of Commerce because he felt the grant funding was
available.
The County Administrator explained that when
applying for grants the use of the funds is clearly defined and the award
is based upon the understanding that the funds will be used for the
identified purposes. Mr.
Mendez did clarify that as a result of the grant funds being awarded there
would be salary savings in the OES Budget, which could be utilized to fund
the Mule Days Celebration request. The
County Administrator also reminded the Board that generally requests for
event and organization funding is considered through the Grants-in-Support
Program, with Mr. Mendez explaining that while a request for OES funding
is not a part of the Grants-in-Support Program, should the Board approve
the request, the funding would be funneled through a grants-in-support
contract. The Board Members
expressed their concern with (a) setting a precedent, (b) the impending
impact of increased insurance costs to other organizations, (c) with
potential increased insurance costs to the County and (d) the unknown
impacts associated with the State Budget crisis.
The Board asked that Staff be on the look out for grant funds which
might be utilized to help defray increased insurance costs as a result of
terrorist activities and asked that the Mule Days Celebration be provided
a grants-in-support application for the upcoming FY 2003/04 budget
consideration. At the
conclusion of the conversation, Mr. Corner withdrew the request from the
Mule Days Celebration for a contribution of $2,000 to defer increased
security costs, thanking the Board for their consideration.
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The Chairperson recessed the regular meeting at
12:40 p.m., reconvening at 1:45 p.m., with all Board Members present,
except Supervisor Arcularius.
|
|
Planning Dept./ Borax Owens
Lake Project
|
Ms. Andrea Clark, Acting Planning Director,
provided additional information on the request to contract with U.S. Borax
and Science Applications International for environmental review and
processing services relative to the proposed U.S. Borax Owens Lake Trona
Processing Project. Mr. Paul
Lamos of U.S. Borax, provided the Board with information describing the
project and updated the Board on the proposed project.
Moved by Supervisor Hambleton and seconded by Supervisor Bear to
take the following action regarding environmental review and processing
services for the proposed U.S. Borax Owens Lake Trona Processing Project:
A) ratify the Contract between the County of
Inyo and U.S. Borax for the period of May 6, 2003, through June 30, 2004,
in an amount not to exceed $152,575, contingent upon the Board’s
adoption of a FY 2003/04 Budget; and authorize the Chairperson to sign,
contingent upon the appropriate signatures being obtained;
B) ratify the Contract between the County of
Inyo and Science Applications International Corporation, for the period of
May 6, 2003, through June 30, 2004, in an amount not to exceed $84,764,
contingent upon the Board’s adoption of a FY 2003/04 Budget; and
authorize the Chairperson to sign, contingent upon the appropriate
signatures being obtained; and
C) amend the FY 2002/03 Planning and Zoning
Budget 023800 by increasing
estimated revenues in Services and Fees (Revenue
Code #4819) by $152,575 and increasing appropriations in Professional and Special
Services (Object
Code #5265) by $84,764. Motion
carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
Ag. Comm./ NRCS Grant
|
Mr. George Milovich, Agricultural
Commissioner and the County Administrator provided additional information,
further clarification and justification for the joint application for an
NRCS grant for noxious weed and salt cedar eradication efforts in the
Owens Valley. Mr. Milovich
explained that (a) this is a cost share program, (b) that there is a 25%
matching requirement, which will be met, and (c) that in the Ag Department
it will increase two part-time positions to full-time. The County Administrator clarified that the funding would
be used to sustain current operations in the Salt Cedar Program and the
Weed Management Program, as well as detailing the exact amount being
applied for which is a little more than $3.2 million.
The Board and Staff discussed the financing for the grant, with Mr.
Mendez explaining that should the Water Fund be unable to up-front the
Water Department’s portion then the General Fund would cover the costs
as is the case in many other grants.
Mr. Mendez did caution the Board that he would anticipate a
discussion regarding the repayment of grants and loaning from General Fund
during the upcoming budget program workshops with the various Departments. Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by Supervisor
Williams to approve the request for authorization of the Inyo County
Agriculture Department Weed Management Division and Inyo County Water
Department Saltcedar Program to provide contract services to the City of
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power for their application to the
Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program/Natural Resource Conservation Services
in the amount of approximately $3.2 million; and authorize the Chairperson
to sign contingent upon the appropriate signatures being obtained. Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius
absent.
|
|
Assessor/Price &
Brumfield Contract
|
Mr. Tom Lanshaw, Assessor, provided
additional information on the request to approve the contract with Price
and Brumfield for preparation of upcoming Coso Appeals. The County Administrator informed the Board that after this
contingencies appropriation and the County’s Counsel’s request the
balance in contingencies will be $260,000.
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by Supervisor Hambleton
to A) amend the FY 2002/03 County Budget as follows: reduce Contingencies
Budget 087100, Contingencies (Object
Code #5901) by $50,000 and increase Assessors Budget 010600, Professional &
Special Services
(Object Code #5265) by $50,000; and B) ratify the Contract between the County of Inyo and
the law firm of Price & Brumfield, LLP for the period of April 1,
2003, through June 30, 2004, in an amount not to exceed $50,000,
contingent upon the Board’s adoption of FY 2003/04 Budget; and authorize
the Chairperson to sign. Motion
carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
Auditor/Fixed Asset Policy
Change
|
Ms. Leslie Chapman, Auditor-Controller,
explained that the request to increase the threshold for capitalization of
assets was being driven by GASB requirements and the amount of work
associated with compliance. She
assured the Board that while those assets under $5,000 would no longer be
monitored for depreciation they would be maintained on the County’s
Asset list. Moved by
Supervisor Williams and seconded by Supervisor Bear to amend the existing County of Inyo Fixed Asset and Equipment Management Policy to reflect an increased
minimum capitalization threshold of $5,000 and updating the language to
more accurately reflect current practices.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
Clerk-Recorder/ Microfilm
Contract
|
Ms. Beverly Harry, Clerk-Recorder, provided
additional information and responded to questions from the Board regarding
the request to enter into a contract for microfilming court and clerk
records. Moved by Supervisor
Bear and seconded by Supervisor Hambleton to approve the Contract between
the County of Inyo and Delta MicroImaging for the provision of scanning
and microfilming services of Court and Clerk-Recorder records for the
initial period of May 13, 2003, through June 30, 2003, and with annual
fiscal year extensions in an amount not to exceed $40,000 per year, for a
total not to exceed $200,000, contingent upon the Board’s adoption of
future budgets; and authorize the Chairperson to sign, contingent upon the
appropriate signatures being obtained.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
County Counsel/
Kirby Contract Amendment
|
Moved by Supervisor Hambleton and seconded by
Supervisor Williams to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement between
the County of Inyo and John D. Kirby, A.P.C., for provision of legal
services for the period of July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2003, increasing
the Contract by $36,000, to an amount not to exceed $206,000; and
authorize the Chairperson to sign. Motion
carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
County Counsel/ Price and
Brumfield Contract Amendment
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by
Supervisor Hambleton to A) ratify Amendment No. 4 to the Contract between
the County of Inyo and the Law Firm of Price & Brumfield, effective
November 1, 2002, for the provision of legal services, increasing the
Contract by $75,000, to an amount not to exceed $200,000 for the period of
July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2003; and authorize the Chairperson to
sign; and B) amend the FY 2002-03 County Budget by reducing Contingencies
Budget 087100, Contingencies (Object
Code #5901) by $58,000 and increasing County Counsel Budget 010700, Professional
and Special Services (Object
Code #5265) by $58,000. Motion
carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
Planning Dept./ Pacific
Municipal Contract
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by
Supervisor Hambleton to approve the Contract between the County of Inyo
and Pacific Municipal Consultants for current and long-range planning
services, for the period of May 13, 2003, through June 30, 2004, in an
amount not to exceed $80,000, contingent upon the Board’s adoption of a
FY 2003/04 Budgets; and authorize the Chairperson to sign.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
Sheriff/COPS Expenditures
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by
Supervisor Williams to A) amend the FY 2002/03 Sheriff’s General Budget
022700 by increasing estimated revenue in Citizen Option, Public Safety (Revenue Code #4488) by $102,641 and increasing appropriations in
expenditures as recommended by Staff by $102,641; and B) award and
authorize the purchase of equipment, etc. as recommended by Staff to the
low bidders and/or declare the following as sole-source providers of
equipment and authorize the purchase of the equipment from those
sole-source providers as recommended by Staff: Motorola for radios;
Davidson’s Law Enforcement for firearms and magazines; Frank E. Wilbur
Company for ID equipment, hardware/software, and supplies; Action Target
for range targets; and Dillion Precision for related training equipment.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
H&H-Child
Care Council/Appt.
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by
Supervisor Hambleton to appoint Deborah Breazeale to serve an unexpired
term ending November 4, 2003. Motion
carried unanimously, with Supervisor Arcularius absent.
|
|
Closed Session
|
The Chairperson recessed open session at 3:20
p.m., to convene in closed session, with all Board Members present, except
Supervisor Arcularius to discuss Agenda Items No. 23.
CONFERENCE
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING/ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a)(c) – One Case -
LORP Pumpback Station Dispute between LADWP and County of Inyo,
Adjudication of Dispute Pursuant to the Long Term Water Agreement entered
June 1997 as Stipulation and Order of Judgment, Inyo County Superior
Court, Case 12908; No. 24.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
EXISTING/ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a)(c) – One Case -
EIR/EIS Lower Owens River Project (LORP) Dispute between LADWP and County of Inyo, Adjudication of
Dispute Pursuant to the Long Term Water Agreement entered June 1997 as
Stipulation and Order of Judgment, Inyo County Superior Court, Case 12908;
No. 25. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING/ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)(c) – One Case -
2003-2004 Annual Operations Plan Dispute between LADWP and County
of Inyo, Adjudication of Dispute Pursuant to the Long Term Water Agreement
entered June 1997 as Stipulation and Order for Judgment, Inyo County
Superior Court, Case No. 12908; No. 26.
CONFERENCE
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING/ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a)(c) – One Case -
Sierra Club v. City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power
and Inyo County, Superior Court Case No. SICVCV01-29768; No. 27.
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957.6) - Instructions to Negotiators re: wages, salaries
and benefits - Employee Organization - ICEA - Negotiators - County
Administrator and Personnel Analyst; and No. 28.
CONFERENCE
WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
- Instructions to Negotiators re: wages, salaries and benefits - Employee
Organization - Elective Officials Assistant Association - Negotiators -
County Administrator and Personnel Analyst
|
|
Report on Closed Session
|
The Chairperson recessed closed session at
6:00 p.m., to reconvene in open session to receive a report on closed
session. County Counsel
reported there were no items discussed in closed session, which were
required by law to be reported on in open session.
|
|
Adjournment
|
The Chairperson adjourned the regular meeting
at 6:00 p.m., to 9:00 a.m., May 20, 2003, in the Board of Supervisors
Room, at the County Administrative Center, in Independence.
|
___________________________________
Chairperson,
Inyo County Board of Supervisors
Attest: RENÉ
L. MENDEZ
Clerk of the Board
by:
___________________________________
Patricia
Gunsolley, Assistant
|