|


















| |
|

|
County
of Inyo
Board
of Supervisors |
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Inyo, State of
California, met in regular session at the hour of 9:10 a.m., on Tuesday,
August 19, 2003, in the Board of Supervisors Room, County Administrative
Center, Independence, with the following Supervisors present: Vice Chairperson Carroll M. Hambleton, Jr., presiding, Linda
Arcularius, Julie Bear, and Ted Williams. Supervisor
Dorame was absent. Supervisor
Hambleton provided the Invocation, and Supervisor Williams led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
|
|
|
|
Public Comment
|
The Chairperson announced that today’s
meeting was being adjourned in the memory of Big Pine Resident Scott
Wilson who recently passed away. The
Chairperson went on to open the public comment period.
Mr. Dick Noles notified the Board of the completion of the
installation of the Water Guzzlers in Inyo and Mono Counties.
He thanked the Board for their continuing support of this project,
explaining that upkeep and maintenance will be the priorities now.
He also stressed the importance of access to these sites, which
remains a concern. The Board
congratulated Mr. Noles on the success of this project and thanked him for
his dedication and tireless efforts on behalf of this project.
|
|
County Dept. Reports
|
The
Chairperson announced the County Department Report period. Mr. Bob Hurd notified the Board of an incident, which had
occurred at the County Health Offices located at the Career Development
Center in Bishop, in which a dubious looking package was received and
which upon closer examination appeared to contain a suspicious substance.
Mr. Hurd explained that proper procedures were followed when the
package was discovered, with the County’s Risk Management and Law
Enforcement being notified. Mr. Hurd explained that as a result of not being able to
determine the exact makeup of the “white powdery substance” contained
in the package and the fact that there was a threatening note accompanying
the package, the determination was made to close the facility and test the
package contents for “anthrax.” Mr.
Hurd informed the Board that the general consensus was that the substance
was a “cleansing abrasive” which came from the scouring pads found in
the package. He pointed out
that while that was the consensus, until official confirmation was
received on the makeup of the substance, the OES Director opted to error
on the side of safety for those individuals working in the facility and
close the offices. The County
Administrator, the County’s Director of Emergency Services, confirmed
the sequence of events, urged patience from those who might be seeking
assistance from those offices located in the Career Development Center
while the facility is closed, and indicated that he would keep the Board
informed as the incident progressed.
The Board thanked Mr. Mendez and the County’s OES Team Members
for their quick response, for exercising great caution, and for taking the
necessary precautionary steps to ensure the safety of those people working
in and accessing the facility.
|
|
Post Agenda Employee
Negotiations
|
The County
Administrator presented the request for the Board to consider a post
agenda closed session item concerning threatened litigation by ICEA/AFSCME
if the County takes action on the recommendations associated with the
request to declare impasse after lengthy negotiation and the County’s
“last, best and final” offer being unilaterally turned down by the
ICEA/AFSME negotiating team without it being presented to the membership. The County Administrator explained that the letter
notifying the County of the intended action was received yesterday and he
feels that even though “negotiation” items are on the Agenda under
closed session, this particular item exceeds coverage under those items
and in order for the Board to protect the best interests of the employees
and the County it is essential that the Board have the opportunity to
discuss this potential for litigation prior to taking action today.
Moved by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Bear to
find that the need to address potential litigation in closed session
regarding a threat by ICEA/AFSCME to seek an injunction against actions to
be taken by this Board regarding employee/employer negotiations, arose
after the Agenda for the August 19, 2003, Board of Supervisors Meeting was
posted, and there is a need for the Board to address this item prior to
the next regularly scheduled meeting, therefore, this item is added as
Agenda Item No. 19A. Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Dorame
absent.
|
|
Closed Session
|
The Chairperson recessed open session at 9:20
a.m., to convene in closed session with all Board Members present, except
Supervisor Dorame, to discuss Agenda Items No. 16.
CONFERENCE
WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
- Instructions to Negotiators re: wages, salaries and benefits - Employee
Organization - ICEA - Negotiators - County Administrator and Personnel
Analyst; No. 17. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.6) - Instructions to Negotiators re: wages, salaries and
benefits - Employee Organization - Elective Officials Assistant
Association (EOAA) - Negotiators - County Administrator and Personnel
Analyst; No. 18. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) - Instructions to
Negotiators re: wages, salaries and benefits - Employee Organization -
Deputy Sheriff’s Association (DSA) - Negotiators - County Administrator
and Personnel Analyst; No. 19. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.6) - Instructions to Negotiators re: wages, salaries
and benefits - Employee Organization - Law Enforcement Administrators’
Association (LEAA) - Negotiators - County Administrator and Personnel
Analyst; and No. 19A. CONFERENCE
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Significant Exposure to
Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) - One
Case - AFSCME threatened a complaint to the California Public Employees
Relations Board seeking an injunction against the County.
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The
Chairperson recessed closed session at 11:30 a.m., to reconvene in open
session at 11:40 a.m., with all Board Members present, except Supervisor
Dorame.
|
|
Forest/W/S on Sierra Nevada
Framework
|
The
Chairperson announced the workshop scheduled with representatives of the
Inyo National Forest on the Sierra Nevada Framework SEIS Amendment had
been postponed and would be rescheduled for the near future.
|
|
CAO-Purchasing/ Printing Bid
|
Moved
by Supervisor Bear and seconded by Supervisor Williams to award Bid No.
2003-01, Printing for FY 2003-04 to Hart Printers and authorize purchase
orders to be approved for various County Departments to order printing
from this bid for FY 2003-04. Motion
carried unanimously, with Supervisor Dorame absent.
|
|
H&H-Hlth Serv./ Laptop P.O.
|
Moved by
Supervisor Bear and seconded by Supervisor Williams to approve the
purchase of two laptop computers for Public Health Preparedness necessary
for communications and alerts through the State purchasing contract in an
amount not to exceed $3,652.83, and direct that these funds be encumbered
prior to August 30, 2003. Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor
Dorame absent.
|
|
P.W./Plans & Specs. Poleta Rd. Project
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by Supervisor
Williams to approve the Plans, Special Provisions and bid documents for
the Poleta Road Improvement Project and authorize the Public Works
Director to advertise for bids for the project.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Dorame absent.
|
|
P.W./Plans & Specs. N. & S Round Valley Rd.
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by Supervisor
Williams to approve the Plans, Special Provision and Bid Package for the
North and South Round Valley Roads Resurfacing Project and authorize the
Public Works Director to advertise for bids for the project.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Dorame
absent.
|
|
P.W./Plans & Specs. Guardrail Project
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by
Supervisor Williams to approve the Plans, Special Provisions and bid
documents for the South County Guardrail Project and authorize the Public
Works Director to advertise for bids for the project.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Dorame absent.
|
|
P.W./Kleinfelder Contract Amend- ment No. 2.
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by
Supervisor Williams to approve Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between
the County of Inyo and Kleinfelder, Inc., for provisions of material
testing services, increasing the contract by
$150,000 to a total not to exceed $200,000, contingent upon the
Board’s adoption of a FY 2003/04 Budget; and authorize the Chairperson
to sign, contingent upon the appropriate signatures being obtained.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Dorame absent.
|
|
Sheriff/Big Pine Substation Lease
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by Supervisor
Williams to approve the Lease between the County of Inyo and Jack Stout
Enterprises for rental of the Sheriff’s Big Pine Substation, from July
1, 2003, through June 30, 2004, at the rate of $400 per month, contingent
upon the Board’s adoption of a FY 2003/04 Budget; and authorize the
Chairperson to sign. Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor
Dorame absent.
|
|
Water Dept./Steel Container P.O.
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by Supervisor
Williams to approve the purchase of one reconditioned 8’ x 40’ steel
container from Martin Container, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $2,203.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor
Dorame absent.
|
|
E. Health/Monit-
oring Well Permits
|
Mr. Bob Hurd, provided additional information
and clarification on the request to permit four monitoring wells east of
the Bishop-Sunland Landfill. He
explained that the permit did not identify the driller because there are
very few drillers certified to drill the type of well being permitted.
Moved by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Bear to
approve 4 groundwater monitoring wells located on City of Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power lands located just east of the
Bishop-Sunland Landfill, contingent upon verification and approval by the
Environmental Health Department that the driller chosen is properly
certified. Motion carried
unanimously, with Supervisor Dorame absent.
|
|
Rd. Dept/Granite Contract - Pa Ha & Tu Su Lanes Resurfacing
|
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by
Supervisor Arcularius to award and approve the Contract to Granite
Construction Company for the Pa Ha and Tu Su Lanes Resurfacing Project in
an amount not to exceed $168,223; authorize the Chairperson to sign,
contingent upon the appropriate signatures being obtained; and authorize
the Public Works Director to execute all other contract documents,
including contract change orders, to the extent permitted by Public
Contract Code Section 20142 and additional applicable law.
Motion carried unanimously, with Supervisor Dorame absent.
|
|
CAO-Personnel/ Negotiations and Impasse
|
The
Chairperson recognized members of the audience wishing to address the
Board regarding the proposed actions being considered to declare impasse
in the negotiations between the County and ICEA/AFSCME. Mr. Keith Uriarte representing ICEA/AFSCME addressed the
Board to provide additional information and details on the negotiation,
and further clarification and commentary on the recommended actions to
declare impasse and unilaterally implement certain portions of the
County’s “last, best and final” offer, which had been turned down by
the negotiators. Mr. Uriarte
reviewed the section of Resolution No. 70-53, the Resolution governing the
employer/employee relationship in Inyo County, highlighting the fact that
mediation/arbitration is required when negotiations are unsuccessful.
Mr. Mark Johnson, Inyo County Assistant District Attorney, spoke to
the issue, imploring the Board to not implement the change to the retiree
medical benefits provided to those employees with less than 5 years
service.
The
County Administrator provided a detailed staff report which included a
review of the items that had been recommended to be implemented and were
included as part of the County’s “last, best & final” offer.
These included:
|
|
|
 |
· salary increases,
|
 |
· increases in longevity pay,
|
 |
· a change in administrator for the medical health plan
from PERS to CSAC
Excess Insurance Authority’s new Health Plan, and
|
 |
·
a change in medical retiree health insurance benefits for
those employees
with less than 5 years service, and/or other employees choosing to opt
out
of the retiree medical benefit plan, which would entail the County paying
the
minimum $97 per month toward the retiree medical insurance and
matching up to 3% of the employees pre-tax salary in a tax deferred
savings plan, and vesting the County’s match on a 100% five year
vesting
schedule.
|
|
|
|
He
went on to explain that, while the Board was in closed session and prior
to the Board taking any actions, the County had received word that the law
firm representing ICEA/AFSCME had actually proceeded with obtaining an
injunction to stop the Board from implementing any changes to the benefits
and/or working conditions of the employees represented by ICEA.
Mr. Mendez explained further that as a result of the legal actions
and the impending injunction, he was changing his recommended actions
regarding those positions represented by ICEA/AFSCME.
He
pointed out that while the positions eligible for ICEA representation were
effected by the actions of the union and the pending injunction, there
were a number of positions, which were either non-represented, management,
appointed and elected which were not subject to the results of the
negotiation process. He
continued that he did not feel there was a need to delay implementation of
the County’s “last, best and final” offer for these positions.
He asked the Board to consider his recommendation to change the
salaries, terms and conditions of employment for those positions to
coincide with the County’s “last, best and final” offer with the
exception of changes in the medical benefits because the County had to
institute that change on a Countywide basis.
He presented the Board with amended documentation regarding
impending actions to be considered by the Board as follows:
1.
1.
Request Board adopt a
resolution declaring impasse with the Inyo County Empoyees’
Association.
Mr. Mendez explained that with the declaration of impasse the
County was now
agreeing to move forward with the mediation
process. He informed the
Board that he would
expect to sign the appropriate documentation with
the union in the next couple of days to
establish the process for mediation and for
retaining a mediator. He told
the Board that he
would keep them informed as the process unfolds.
2.
2.
Request Board adopt a
resolution setting salary, terms and conditions of employment for
employees represented by the Inyo County
Employees Association. Mr.
Mendez explained
that this item leaves “in tact” all current
salaries and benefits for those positions represented by
ICEA and agrees to leave in place those items
identified in the MOU, which is terminated once
impasse is declared, until mediation is
concluded. He further
explained that this resolution
recognizes the “status quo” and stressed that
it ensures there is no change in the
employer/employee relationship for those
positions represented by ICEA as a result of impasse
being declared.
He confirmed that there would be no change in the PERS
administration of the
County’s Blue Cross Medical Insurance Plan nor
will there be a change in the retiree medical
benefits.
3.
3.
Request Board adopt a
resolution setting salary, terms and conditions of employment for
non-represented employees employed in the several offices or institutions
of the County of
Inyo. Mr.
Mendez explained that this resolution changes the terms and conditions for
those
positions, which are not represented by ICEA. He detailed that this resolution provides the
non-represented employees with the benefits identified in the County’s
“last, best and final”
offer, with the exception of there being no
change in the health or retiree medical benefits.
Mr.
Mendez reviewed the major changes as follows:
(a) 2% salary increase January 1, 2004; 2%
salary increase January
1, 2005; (b) beginning July 1, 2004, Longevity Pay of 2% after 10
years;
another 2% after 15 years; and another 2% after 20 years; (c) PERS on PERS
which
reports the employees PERS retirement contribution, which is paid by
the County, as salary for
the employee’s retirement pay calculation; and
(d) allow 200 days instead of 120 days of
accrued sick leave to be
converted to service credit.
4. 4. Request Board adopt a
resolution setting salary, terms and conditions of employment for
non-represented management employees employed in the several offices or
institutions of the
County of Inyo. Mr.
Mendez explained that this resolution provides the non-represented
management employees with the same benefits as provided the
non-represented employees
and explained in No. 3 above.
5.
Request Board adopt a
resolution rescinding Resolution 2003-41 and setting salary and/or terms
and conditions of employment for appointed officials employed in the
several offices or institutions of the County of Inyo. Mr. Mendez explained that this resolution provides the
appointed officials with the same benefits as provided to the
non-represented and non-represented management employees and explained in
No. 3 above.
6.
Request Board adopt a
resolution paying and reporting the value of employer paid member
contributions. Mr. Mendez
explained that this provides implementation of the PERS on PERS reporting
as described in No. 3 (c) above.
7.
Request Board to direct
Staff to begin the ordinance process to change the salary, and/or terms
and conditions of employment for the elected officials of the County
including the Board of Supervisors to reflect the same benefits as
provided to the non-represented employees, the non-represented management
employees, and the appointed officials and explained in No. 3 above. Mr. Mendez explained that once the ordinances are adopted
the changes for elected officials other than the Board of Supervisors
would be effective 30 days after adoption and in the case of the Board of
Supervisors 60 days after adoption.
8.
Request Board remove
from consideration the request to approve Amendment #2 to the Memorandum
of Understanding between the County of Inyo and the Inyo County Deputy
Sheriff’s Association and any subsequent action with the Law Enforcement
Administrators Association (LEAA) because the Board is no longer
instituting a change in the medical health benefits.
9.
Request Board remove
from consideration the request to approve the Memorandum of Understanding
with the California State Association of Counties (CSAC) Excess Insurance
Authority EIA Health Program because the Board is no longer instituting a
change in medical health benefits.
10.
Request Board remove
from consideration any action which would change the medical health
benefits for the Elected Officials Assistant Association (EOAA) because
the Board is no longer instituting a change in medical health benefits.
Mr. Mendez clarified further that this is also a separate
bargaining unit similar to ICEA and negotiations must be instigated in
order for changes in salaries and/or terms and conditions of employment to
be considered.
11.
Request Board remove
from consideration the request to adopt a resolution electing to cease to
be subject to the Public Employees’ Medical and Hospital Care Act.
Mr. Mendez explained that this action is no longer necessary
because the Board is not instituting a change in medical health benefits,
is not opting out of PERS administration of the County’s Blue Cross
Medical Insurance, nor is the County instituting a change in the PERS
retiree medical benefit.
|
|
|
At the conclusion of the County Administrator’s
remarks Mr. Uriarte, representing ICEA/AFSCME offered additional comments
on the actions being recommended by the County Administrator.
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The Chairperson recessed the regular meeting
at 1:45 p.m., reconvening at 2:45 p.m., with all Board Members present,
except Supervisor Dorame.
|
|
Resol. #2003-46/ Impasse
Declared
|
On a motion by Supervisor Bear and a second
by Supervisor Arcularius, Resolution No. 2003-46 entitled “A Resolution
of the Board of Supervisors, County of Inyo, State of California,
Declaring Impasse with the Inyo County Employees’ Association” was
adopted: motion unanimously passed and adopted, with Supervisor Dorame
absent.
|
|
Resol. #2003-47/ ICEA
Represented Positions Salaries
|
On a motion by Supervisor Arcularius and a
second by Supervisor Williams, Resolution No. 2003-47 entitled “A
Resolution of the Board of Supervisors, County of Inyo State of
California, Setting Salary, Terms and Conditions of Employment for
Employees Represented by the Inyo County Employees Association” was
adopted: motion unanimously passed and adopted, with Supervisor
Dorame absent.
|
|
Resol. #2003-48/
Non-Represented Positions Salaries
|
On a motion by Supervisor Williams and a
second by Supervisor Arcularius, Resolution No. 2003-48 entitled “A
Resolution of the Board of Supervisors, County of Inyo, State of
California, Setting Salary, Terms and Conditions of Employment for
Non-Represented Employees Employed in the Several Offices or Institutions
of the County of Inyo” was adopted: motion unanimously passed and
adopted with Supervisor Dorame absent.
|
|
Resol. #2003-49/
Non-Represented Management Salaries
|
On a motion by Supervisor Arcularius and a
second by Supervisor Bear, Resolution No. 2003-49 entitled “A Resolution
of the Board of Supervisors, County of Inyo, State of California, Setting
Salary, Terms and Conditions of Employment for Non-Represented Management
Employees Employed in the Several Offices or Institutions of the County of
Inyo” was adopted: motion unanimously passed and adopted, with
Supervisor Dorame absent.
|
|
Resol. #2003-50/ Appointed
Officials Salaries
|
Supervisor Arcularius commented that the
Board’s actions regarding the implementation of provisions of the
County’s “last, best and final” offer were being made after over 18
months of negotiations and based on the belief that this is an excellent
offer especially in light of the situation with the State Budget and its
impacts on the County. She
also explained that the Board Members did not approach the change in the
health benefit plan from PERS to CSAC lightly.
She discussed the fact that the Board and their families are also
affected by a change like this and they would not do anything to harm
their families, nor the employees or their families.
Supervisors Bear, Williams and Hambleton concurred with Supervisor
Arcularius’ remarks and echoed her sentiments. In responding to
questions from the Board, the County Administrator explained that the
reason he was requesting the change in insurance be accomplished prior to
August 22, 2003, was because PERS had recently changed an internal rule
which penalized PERS agencies opting out of PERS Medical Benefits by
requiring the agency wait two years before being able to return to the
program. He informed the Board that PERS has changed the two-year penalty
period to a five-year penalty period.
He explained that he was secure in his ability to have the County
evaluate the CSAC Health Program and ensure no change in the County’s
ability to maintain the same medical benefits as currently provided for
the 2-year period. He went on
to say that while he still supports the switch to CSAC, he feels the
five-year waiting period would require an updated analysis of the impacts
and risks. At the conclusion
of the discussion, the Board directed Staff to begin the ordinance
adoption process for changes in salaries for the elected officials,
including the Board of Supervisors.
On a motion by Supervisor Arcularius and a
second by Supervisor Bear, Resolution No. 2003-50 entitled “A Resolution
of the Board of Supervisors, County of Inyo, State of California,
Rescinding Resolution No. 2003-41 and Setting Salary and/or Terms and
Conditions of Employment for Appointed Officials Employed in the Several
Offices or Institutions of the County of Inyo” was adopted: motion
unanimously passed and adopted, with Supervisor Dorame absent.
|
|
Resol. #2003-51/ PERS on
PERS Reporting
|
On a motion by Supervisor Bear and a second
by Supervisor Williams, Resolution No. 2003-51, entitled “Resolution of
the Board of Supervisors, County of Inyo, State of California, Paying and
Reporting the Value of Employer Paid Member Contributions” was adopted:
motion unanimously passed and adopted, with Supervisor Dorame absent.
|
|
Museum Tour
|
The Chairperson announced that the 1:30 tour of the
Eastern California Museum located in Independence would be rescheduled.
|
|
Report on Closed Session
|
County Counsel reported there were no items
discussed in closed session, which were required by law to be reported on
in open session.
|
|
Adjournment
|
At 3:10 p.m., the Chairperson adjourned the
regular meeting, in memory of Big Pine Resident Scott Wilson.
He adjourned the meeting to 9:00 a.m., August 26, 2003, in the
Board of Supervisors Room, at the County Administrative Center in
Independence.
|
___________________________________
Chairperson,
Inyo County Board of Supervisors
Attest: RENÉ
L. MENDEZ
Clerk of the Board
by:
___________________________________
Patricia
Gunsolley, Assistant
|