|


















| |
|

|
County
of Inyo
Board
of Supervisors |
The Board of
Supervisors of the County of Inyo, State of California, met in regular session
at the hour of 9:15 a.m., on Tuesday,
March 23, 2004, in the Board of Supervisors Room, County Administrative
Center, Independence, with the following Supervisors present:
Chairperson Carroll “Butch” Hambleton presiding, Linda Arcularius,
Julie Bear, Ted Williams, and Michael Dorame.
Supervisor Dorame provided the Invocation, and Supervisor Williams led
the Pledge of Allegiance.
|
|
|
|
Public Comment
|
The
Chairperson announced the public comment period and there was no one from
the public wishing to comment.
|
|
County Dept. Reports
|
The
Chairperson announced the County Department Report period and there were
no reports forthcoming.
|
|
Introduction
|
Ms. Jean
Dickinson, Director of Health and Human Services, introduced Ms. Lisa
Keller, an Eligibility Worker to the Board.
|
|
Integ. Waste/Tub Assembly P. O.
|
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by
Supervisor Dorame to approve the purchase of one (1) Inner Tub Assembly
for the tub grinder from Jones Manufacturing in an amount not to exceed
$5,387.50. Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
Rd. Dept./Tree Removal
|
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by
Supervisor Dorame to authorize County Road Department Personnel to remove
two trees in the road right of way at the east end of Choctaw Drive near
the intersection of Sioux Lane. Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
Sheriff/Body Armor P.O.
|
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by
Supervisor Dorame to declare Adamson Industries of Costa Mesa, California,
a sole-source provider of body armor and authorize the purchase of
thirteen (13) Second Chance Monarch 6th Generation Summit Level
II replacement vests in an amount not to exceed $9,154.88, plus tax and
shipping. Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
HHS-Misc/ Vehicle P.O.
|
Ms. Lita Shepard, Health and Human Services Department,
requested that the Board consider, in an addition to the award of the
vehicle bids to also amend the CBFRSG budget to accommodate the purchases.
She indicated that it was an oversight not to request the appropriation
change at the time this agenda item was being prepared. The County Administrator also informed the Board that the
budget amendment action would require a 4/5’s vote. Moved by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor
Bear to A) amend the FY2003/04 CBFRSG Budget Unit 642503 by increasing
appropriations in Vehicles (Object Code #5674)
by $1,658 and
reducing appropriations in General Operating Expense (Object Code
#5311) by $1,658; B) award the bid for and authorize the purchase of a
4x4 utility vehicle from the low bidder, Eastern Sierra Motors, in an
amount not to exceed $21,657.45 and C) award the bid for and approve the
purchase of one 7-passenger all-wheel-drive minivan from the low bidder,
Rotolo Chevrolet, in an amount not to exceed $22,242.83.
Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
Public Defender/ Budget Amendment
|
The County Administrator provided additional
information and further explanation for the Public Defender budget
amendment. He explained that
the $30,000 increase, which was being requested, should cover normal
Public Defender costs through the end of this fiscal year.
He clarified that these higher Public Defender costs were due in
large part to the anomaly in the crime statistics, which were reported on
by the Sheriff last week and which reflect higher crime rates in the past
several months. He also
explained that the $30,000 is not a part of the special circumstances
case, where the costs are being tracked in a separate budget line item.
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by
Supervisor Williams to amend the FY 2003-04 County Budget by reducing
Contingencies Budget Unit 087100, Contingencies (Object
Code #5901) by $30,000 and increasing appropriations in Public Defender Budget
Unit 022600, Other Professional Services (Object
Code #5265) by $30,000.
Motion carried
unanimously.
|
|
Clerk-Elections/ Statement of Votes Cast
|
Supervisor Dorame asked what the final
election costs were for the March 2, 2004 primary. Ms. Mary Roper, Assistant Clerk-Recorder, indicated that
the final tally had not been calculated and that she would provide that
information once the amount was known.
Moved by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Bear to
accept the Statement of All Votes Cast at the Consolidated Primary
Election held March 2, 2004. Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
E. Health/S. W. Management Hearing Panel Appointment
|
Moved by Supervisor Dorame and seconded by
Supervisor Williams to make the following appointments to the Integrated
Solid Waste Management Hearing Panel to complete two-year terms ending
March 17, 2006: A) Mr. Dan Totheroh as the Technical representative and B)
Mr. Bob Hayner, representing the Public-at-Large. Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
HHS-First Five Comm./IMACA Contract School Readiness
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by
Supervisor Arcularius to approve the contract between the County of Inyo
and Inyo Mono Advocates for Community Action (IMACA) for school readiness
services for the period of April 1, 2004, through March 31, 2008, in an
amount not to exceed $475,280, contingent upon the Board’s adoption of
future budgets; and authorize the Chairperson to sign. Motion
carried unanimously.
|
|
HHS-First Five Comm./Budget Amendment
|
Ms. Lita Shepard, Health and Human Services
Dept., requested that the budget amendment being requested be changed to
reflect $19,152 instead of $11,000. She
explained that the Commission had allocated additional money to the Office
of Education for the School Readiness Program.
She also asked that the Agenda Request Form Summary Discusion
section be amended to reflect a total of $98,598 instead of the total of
$90,446. Moved by Supervisor
Williams and seconded by Supervisor Dorame to amend the FY 2003-04 County
Budget as follows: A)
increase estimated revenue in Children and Families Commission Budget Unit
643000, State Grants (Revenue Code #4498) by $32,575 and increase appropriations in
Professional and Special Services (Object
Code #5265) by $112,021 and Grant Contributions (Object Code #5538) by $19,152; and B) increase estimated revenue
in Oral Health Budget Unit 643006, Other Agency (Revenue Code #4599), by
$19,152 and increase appropriations in Professional and Special Services (Object Code #5265) by $19,152.
Motion carried
unanimously.
|
|
HHS-First Five Comm./IMACA Contracts
|
Moved by Supervisor Bear and seconded by
Supervisor Arcularius take the following actions regarding contracts
between the County of Inyo and the Inyo Mono Advocates for Community
Action (IMACA) and authorize the Chairperson to sign: A) approve Amendment
No. Two which cancels the current Contract for the period of March 1,
2001, through June 30, 2004, effective April 1, 2004; and B) approve the
new contract for the provision of countywide home visiting services for
the period of April 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005, in an amount not to
exceed $107,021, including the option to renew for the period of April 1,
2005, through March 31, 2006 in an amount not to exceed $107,755 and April
1, 2006, through March 31, 2007, in an amount not to exceed $111,356, and
authorize the Commission to exercise the renewal options, contingent upon
the Board’s adoption of future budgets.
Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
Probation/Office of Education Extended Day Program
|
Moved by Supervisor Dorame and seconded by
Supervisor Williams to ratify the Contract between the County of Inyo and
the Inyo County Office of Education for the Extended Day Program, for the
period of July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004, in an amount not to exceed
$30,000; and authorize the Chairperson to sign.
Motion carried
unanimously.
|
|
Sheriff/Seizure Trust Transfer
|
Moved by Supervisor Dorame and seconded by
Supervisor Arcularius to approve the transfer of fund balance, in the
amount of $33,856.23, from the Sheriff’s Drug Enforcement Seizure Trust
Budget Unit 502703, to the District Attorney’s DA Federal Asset Seizure
Trust Budget Unit 502405. Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
Water Dept./ Budget Amendment
|
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by
Supervisor Arcularius to A) amend the FY 2003-04 Wildlife Conservation
Board Grant Budget 621700 by increasing estimated revenue in State Grant (Revenue Code #4498) by $78,552 and increasing appropriations by
$78,552 as recommended by Staff, (4/5’s
vote required); B) approve Amendment No. 1 to the Wildlife Conservation Board Grant
No. WC-1002SC, ending May 1, 2006, in the amount of $560,000; and C)
ratify the Water Director’s action to sign the Amendment. Motion
carried unanimously.
|
|
BofS/Minute Approval
|
Moved by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded
by Supervisor Dorame to approve the minutes of the Board of Supervisors
Meeting of March 9, 2004. Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The Chairperson recessed the regular meeting
at 10:05 a.m., reconvening at 10:15 a.m., with all Board Members Present.
|
|
Parks/Tecopa Concessionaire
|
Mr. Chuck
Hamilton, Deputy County Administrator, reviewed the Staff Report and
recommendations regarding the recommendation to contract with California
Land Management of Palo Alto as the concessionaire for the Tecopa Hot
Springs. Ms. Kim Swords, Ms.
Yvonne Ball, and Mr. James Ramm, opposed the concessionaire concept for
the Campground and advocated the County maintain the operations. Ms. Jennifer Verik, Hummingbird Family Resource Center,
presented a thank-you poster made by the children of the Center to the
Board of Supervisors, for the new playground equipment. Ms. Verik and Ms. Jan Rucquio supported the concessionaire
proposal submitted by the Hummingbird Family Resource Center, expressing
their desire to see the operations maintained locally.
Mr. Richard Cervantes, Lone Pine Resident, opposed the
concessionaire concept. Mr.
Brad Goans, Friends of Tecopa, opposed the privatization of the baths and
asked that the item be tabled until the new Supervisor took office.
Boris Gelhaar, visitor, opposed the privatization of the baths.
Ms. Joy Melgard, Bishop Resident and Inyo County Parks Advisory
Committee Member, supported the recommendation for a concessionaire for
the Campground. The Board,
Staff and members of the audience discussed the proposed recommendation
and the alternatives in detail and at length, including, the County’s
obligations for sewer pond clean-up irrespective of the disposition of the
operations issues, historical use of the waters, the healing powers of the
water, the restrictions which may be placed if the baths are privatized,
as well as development potential for the facilities and the ability to
mobilize and sustain local volunteer efforts in relationship to operations
at the baths.
Mr. Steve
Parson, Tecopa Resident, addressed the Board to question the
accountability of the current employees of the County in Tecopa.
Mr. Wayne Templeton opposed changes in the operations at the
Campgrounds. Mr. Mike Koi,
Tecopa Resident, addressed the Board to say he had no complaints about the
baths and suggesting that more activities be planned using the baths as a
focal point. Those opposing
the recommendation presented petitions from people opposing any change to
the County’s ordinance, which would require bathing suits at the baths
and opposing the privatization of the baths.
During the discussion the County Administrator suggested that the
Board direct staff to develop criteria to help the Board assess the top
two proposals. At that time
he indicated to the Board that based on the County’s history with the
Hummingbird Family Resource Center in the CDBG Grant process he would
recommend the Center as the second in the top two proposals received.
Supervisor
Dorame expressed his concern that the baths and the campground operations
be protected and supported Staff’s recommendation for the
concessionaire. Supervisor
Dorame moved, with no second, to direct staff to negotiate the specific
terms and conditions for a contract with California Land Management of
Palo Alto, for concessionaire operations of the Tecopa Hot Springs
Campground, to include the concerns identified by the residents for
maintaining historical use and allowing access to local residents.
The motion failed on a one-to-four roll-call vote, with Supervisor
Dorame voting yes, and with Supervisors Arcularius, Bear, Williams and
Hambleton voting no. The
Board continued to discuss the recommendation with several Board Members
expressing their desire to proceed with an evaluation process, to evaluate
the top two proposals. Supervisors
Arcularius and Hambleton expressed their desire to consider a second
proposal, while also expressing concern with the local volunteer effort
being able to be sustained in light of the apparent discourse displayed
between the supporters of the Friends of Tecopa and the Hummingbird Family
Resource Center.
Moved by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by
Supervisor Bear to direct Staff to come back April 6, 2004, with criteria
parameters to evaluate the proposals for the concessionaire operations of
the Tecopa Hot Springs Campground received from California Land Management
and Hummingbird Family Resource Center.
Motion carried on a four-to-one vote, with Supervisors Arcularius,
Bear, Williams and Hambleton voting yes, and with Supervisor Dorame voting
no.
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The
Chairperson recessed the regular meeting at 1:30 p.m., reconvening at 2:05
p.m., with all Board Members present.
|
|
E. Health/Well Permits
|
Mr. Dave Oldenburg, Environmental Health
Director, Dr. Randy Jackson, Hydrologist, and Mr. Larry Beaman, Desert
Aggregate, provided additional information on the request for three
monitoring wells located near Five Bridges Road and the Desert Aggregate
operations in the area. Mr.
Beaman explained that the wells were needed in conjunction with proposed
expansion of the Desert Aggregate operations.
Moved by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Williams
to approve three (3) well permit applications submitted by the City of Los
Angeles Department of Water and Power for three monitoring wells to be
located near Five Bridges Road. Motion carried unanimously.
|
|
Planning/Appeal by Pine Creek Development
|
The
Chairperson opened the public hearing at 2:15 p.m., to consider an appeal
by Mr. Lynn Goodfellow, dba Pine Creek Development, of a Planning
Commission’s decision regarding the applicant’s standing for Pine
Creek Mine. Ms. Freda
Pechner, Counsel for the Appellants, presented their case in support of
Mr. Goodfellow’s appeal of a Planning Commission decision denying Pine
Creek Development standing to apply for an amended reclamation plan for
the Pine Creek Mine site. Ms.
Pechner entered into the record the following:
Exhibit 1, a March 17, 2004 Letter from Ms. Carolyn Saputo of the
Department of Conservation to Mr. Stan Hess; Exhibit 2, a February 26,
1992 Planning Department Staff Report regarding the Reclamation Plan
#91-4/U.S. Tungsten Corporation; Exhibit 3, a March 2, 1992 letter from
the Planning Director to Tim Scott, U.S. Tungsten; and Exhibits R, J, P, Z
& D from the Planning Department Staff Report for this item.
Mr. Allen Berry, Counsel for the Planning
Department and Commission, proceeded with the Planning Commission’s
case. Ms. Leslie Klusmire,
Planning Director, as well as Mr. Gary Oye, U.S. Forest Service, Mr. Jim
Pompy, Office of Mine Reclamation and Mr. Robert Joehnck, Counsel for the
Department of Conservation, representing the Office of Mine Reclamation,
provided testimony supporting the Planning Commission’s decision to deny
Mr. Lynn Goodfellow, dba Pine Creek Development standing to submit an
amended reclamation plan for the Pine Creek Mine site until the two
requirements of SMARA for standing, which are that responsibility for the
current reclamation plan is accepted and the appropriate financial
assurances for that plan are posted, are met.
The County entered into the record the following:
Exhibit 4, the Inyo County Staff Report and all attachments and
exhibits which are identified hereto as Exhibits, A through ZZ and AA and
Exhibit 5 Excerpts of SMARA Regarding Standing.
The Chairperson closed the public hearing at 5:25 p.m.
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The
Chairperson recessed the regular meeting at 5:25 p.m., reconvening at 5:45
p.m., with all Board Members present.
|
|
Planning/Appeal by Pine Creek Development
|
The Board Members discussed the appeal by
Pine Creek Development of a Planning Commission’s decision to deny
standing to Mr. Lynn Goodfellow of Pine Creek Development LLC, to submit
an amended reclamation plan for the Pine Creek Mine site because Mr.
Goodfellow has not met the requirement that he accept the approved
reclamation plan and post adequate financial assurances.
Moved by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Bear to uphold
the Planning Commission’s decision that Mr. Goodfellow does not have
standing at this time, send it back to the Planning Commission for
determination if the formal acceptance and assignment of the reclamation
plan has been met and that adequate financial assurances have been posted.
Motion carried
unanimously.
|
|
Adjourned
|
The Chairperson adjourned the Special Meeting
at 6:10 p.m.
|
____________________________________
Chairperson,
Inyo County Board of Supervisors
Attest: RENÉ
L. MENDEZ
Clerk of the Board
|