|


















| |
|
|
County
of Inyo
Board
of Supervisors
|
The
Board of Supervisors of the County of Inyo, State of California, met in regular
session at the hour of 9:05 a.m., on Tuesday, October
26, 2004, in the Board of Supervisors Room, County Administrative Center,
Independence, with the following Supervisors present:
Chairperson Carroll “Butch” Hambleton presiding, Linda Arcularius,
Ted Williams, and Michael Dorame. Supervisor
Bear was absent. Supervisor Dorame
provided the Invocation, and Supervisor Williams led the Pledge of Allegiance.
|
|
|
| Public
Comment
|
The
Chairperson announced the public comment period.
Ms. Arlene Grider, President of the Independence Chamber of
Commerce read into the record a letter supporting and endorsing the TOT
and TUT Measures on the November 2, 2004, ballot.
She also provided the Board with a Chamber press release regarding
the Chamber’s support of the two measures.
The Board Members thanked Ms. Grider and the Independence Chamber
of Commerce for their taking a position to support these measures.
|
|
County
Dept. Reports
|
The
Chairperson announced the County Department Report period.
Ms. Tamara Cohn, Director of Clinical Services, updated the Board
on the status of the flu vaccine shortage in Inyo County. She reported
that the County has received its allotment from the State and at 580 doses
it is 75% less than what was received last year.
She explained that a portion of the County’s doses would be
allotted to local health care providers, Northern Inyo Hospital, the
Sierra Country Club and the Bishop Convalescent Hospital.
She also explained that the County is coordinating a
“surveillance” program with local physicians in order to identify
local flu diagnosis. She
indicated that she would keep the Board informed as the flu season
progresses. Mr.
George Milovich, Agricultural Commissioner, updated the Board on several
items relative to his Office, including the results of the 2003-2004
Effectiveness Evaluation Report for Inyo/Mono County’s Pesticide
Regulatory Program which were satisfactory.
|
|
Water
Dept./ Response to Neg. Mitigated Dec on Indy Regreening Project
|
Mr.
Robert Mannatt, representing the proponents of the Independence Sports
Complex Project, asked the Board to ensure that whatever action they take
regarding the Eastside Regreening Project include protection for the
Sports Complex concept. He
asked that a representative of the project proponents be included in any
discussions with DWP regarding regreening issues, which might affect their
project. In response to a question from Supervisor Hambleton, Mr. Mannatt
confirmed that he felt the proposed letter being considered by the Board
was sufficient to protect his concerns.
Ms. Loralee Cole addressed the Board to also support the Sports
Complex Project. The Board
and the County Administrator discussed specific items in the letter.
Supervisor Williams expressed a concern with the description of the
vegetation being vague and also with the 3 acre-feet vs. 5 acre-feet
inference. Supervisor
Arcularius expressed a desire to have the effect of 3 acre-feet vs. 5
acre-feet requirements more clearly defined.
Moved by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Williams
to approve the letter to the LADWP concerning LADWP’s mitigated negative
declaration on the Independence East Side Regreening Project and Town
Water System, as amended to more clearly define the effect of 3 acre-feet
vs. 5 acre-feet and the definition of vegetation; and authorize the
Chairperson to sign and send the letter. Motion
carried unanimously, with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
|
Parks/Aug.
2004 Fish Plant Payment Authorization
|
Moved
by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Williams to approve
and ratify two purchase orders to Alpers Trout Hatchery for fish planting
services in the amount of $1,035 each for a total of $2,070 for the August
planting; and authorize the Auditor-Controller to make the payment.
Motion
carried unanimously,
with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
|
HHS-Behavioral
Hlth/Mayo Newhall Hospital Contract
|
Moved
by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Williams to approve
the Contract between the County of Inyo and Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial
Hospital for the provision of inpatient mental health managed care
services, including professional services, for the period of October 1,
2004, through June 30, 2005, in an amount not to exceed $10,000; and
authorize the Chairperson to sign. Motion
carried unanimously,
with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
|
HHS-Behavioral
Hlth./MOU re: Early Mental Health Initiative Grant
|
Moved
by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Williams to approve
the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Bishop Union Elementary
School District as part of the Early Mental Health Initiative Grant 2004
Application submitted by the District; and authorize the Chairperson and
the Department Head to sign. Motion
carried unanimously,
with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
|
HHS-Hlth
Serv./ Local Bioterrorism Agreement
|
Moved
by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Williams to approve
the Agreement between the County of Inyo and the California Department of
Health Services for the provision of Local Public Health Preparedness and
Response to Bioterrorism, for the period of July 1, 2004 through August
30, 2005; and authorize the Chairperson to sign.
Motion
carried unanimously,
with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
| BofS/Prop
68 Position
|
The
County Administrator explained that the request to take a position on Prop
68 was before the Board at the request of Mr. Josh Pelzer, who had
appeared before the Board early in the month.
Supervisor Williams informed the Board that he was under the
impression that the proponents of the Measure had withdrawn their efforts
in light of recent polls, which indicated the Proposition was going to
fail. He said that he thought
this request was now a moot point. The
County Administrator informed the Board that he expected to include in
this year’s legislative platform the need for legislation that ensures
that County issues and concerns are addressed before new gambling
establishments are considered. He
explained that this concept parallels the Governor’s concerns in that
any new State compacts for casinos are contingent upon addressing local
issues.
During
the discussion on a position on Prop 68, Supervisor Arcularius mentioned
that she had been asked and provided assistance to some of her
constituents who were concerned that they mark their absentee ballots
appropriately. Supervisor
Williams added that he had requested an absentee ballot for the November
2, 2004, election. He went on
to inform the Board that through the course of voting, he determined that
the instructions did not match the ballot and that he was unable to follow
the directions provided with the ballot because he had received a ballot,
which was not perforated and therefore could not be punched as directed. He explained that in checking this situation out with the
County Clerk’s Office he had been told to just mark his choices and that
the Elections Department would make the punches.
Supervisor Williams expressed his concern that other local absentee
voters may have experienced the same problem and that he was not aware of
any announcement or education process to let the public know that there
was an anomaly with some of the absentee ballots or how to appropriately
mark those ballots.
Moved
by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Dorame to not adopt a
resolution opposing Proposition 68 as requested by Mr. Josh Pelzer
representing the Coalition of Indian Gaming Tribes.
Motion
carried unanimously,
with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
|
Workshop/Parks
& Campgrounds Improvements
|
The
Chairperson recessed open session at 10:05 a.m., to convene in a workshop,
with all Board Members present, except Supervisor Bear, to discuss with
the Deputy County Administrator the status of the Inyo County Parks and
Campgrounds Improvement Plan. The
Chairperson recessed the workshop at 10:50 a.m., to reconvene in open
session at 11:05 a.m., with all Board Members present except Supervisor
Bear.
|
|
Workshop
on Public Rights of Way Across Private Property
|
The
Board met in a workshop with County Counsel to receive a presentation on
the proposal to establish
procedures and policies for the County enforcement of public rights of way
across private property. The
Board, County Counsel, County Administrator and members of the audience
including Stan Conger and Dan Totheroh discussed staff’s recommendations
regarding the policies and procedures.
The Board and Staff revised the wording for the resolution in order
to provide the broadest flexibility in addressing public-private right of
way issues. The Chairperson
recessed the workshop at 11:50 a.m., to reconvene in open session, with
all Board Members present, except Supervisor Bear.
|
|
Resol.
#2004-55/ Policies & Procedures re: Public Rights
|
County
Counsel, Mr. Paul Bruce, reviewed the specific changes identified during
the previous workshop regarding the proposed resolution setting forth the
procedures and policies for the County’s enforcement of public rights of
way across private property, which included the following:
·
The
addition of “or protection” in the title;
·
The
addition of “or otherwise protect…” in the first whereas, the third
whereas, the now therefore paragraph and item no. 1;
·
The
clerical correction to add the word “be” to item no. 1;
·
The
addition of another bullet under item no. 2. to read “identification of
what actions and efforts have been taken to allow public use of the right
of way, and what were the results;
·
The
addition of “or take other actions to protect” after enforce in item
no. 4;
·
The
addition of the word private in the first bullet of item no. 4;
·
The
addition of “or protected” in the third bullet of no. 4;
·
The
deletion of “and not merely a group of individuals” at the end of item
no. 4;
·
The
addition of “or protection in the fourth bullet of no. 4;
and
·
The
addition of “or other County Staff and “or otherwise protect” in
item no. 5.
On a motion by Supervisor Arcularious and a second by
Supervisor Williams, Resolution No. 2004-55 was adopted, setting forth
those procedures and policies for the County’s enforcement of public
rights of way across private property, as amended;
motion unanimously passed and adopted, with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
|
HHS-Health
Serv./Cert of No Supplanting Bioterrorism Funds
|
Moved
by Supervisor Williams and seconded by Supervisor Dorame to approve the
Certification Against Supplanting of the 2004-05 Inyo County Bioterrorism
Preparedness Grant Funds that certifies that the funds were not supplanted
for Bioterrorism Preparedness expenditures, that reports concerning the
funds are accurate and that the funds were placed in the trust fund and
used only according to the County Bioterrorism Preparedness Plan and
budget; and authorize the Chairperson to sign.
Motion
carried unanimously,
with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
|
Recess/
Reconvene
|
The
Chairperson recessed the regular meeting at 12:10 p.m., to reconvene at
1:05 p.m., with all Board Members present.
|
|
CAO-Personnel/
Ord. Rescinding 1-1-05 COLA for Elected Officials
|
The
County Administrator explained that this as well as the next action are
necessary to facilitate not implementing the January 1, 2005, 2% COLA for
elected and appointed department heads.
Mr. Mendez presented the Board with corrected copies of the
ordinance and the resolution being considered in the next item, explaining
that the documents previously distributed had rounded the salaries to the
nearest cent and the revised documents round to the nearest dollar. The Board Members thanked the appointed and elected
officials for their recognition of the fiscal problems facing the County
and for their willingness to be proactive to help keep the vital programs
and services maintained, by volunteering to not take this COLA. The Board also took the opportunity to highlight that
while they as a Board are excluded from this ordinance, in prior actions
taken the first part of this year the Board of Supervisors returned both
their January 1, 2004, 2% COLA as well as their January 1, 2005 2% COLA.
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by Supervisor Dorame to waive the first reading of an ordinance, as amended, entitled “An
Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors, County of Inyo, State of
California, Amending Section 2.88.040 of the Inyo County Code to Rescind
the January 1, 2005 Salary Increase for Certain Elected Officials,
Excluding Members of the Board of Supervisors;” and set November 2,
2004, at 10:05 a.m., in the Board of Supervisors Room at the County
Administrative Center, in Independence as the date, time and place for the
enactment. Motion
carried unanimously,
with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
|
Resol.
#2004-56/ Rescind 1-1-2005 COLA for Appointed Officials
|
On
a motion by Supervisor Arcularius and a second by Supervisor Dorame,
Resolution No. 2004-56, as amended and entitled “A Resolution of the
Board of Supervisors, County of Inyo, State of California, Rescinding
Resolution No. 2003-50 and Modifying the Salary and/or Terms and
Conditions of Employment for Appointed Officials Employed in the Several
Offices or Institutions of the County of Inyo by Rescinding the January 1,
2005, Salary Increase for Appointed Officials,” was adopted: motion
unanimously passed and adopted, with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
| EMS/Enviroguide
Contract Amendment
|
Moved
by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Williams to approve
Amendment No. 1 to the Contract between the County of Inyo and Enviroguide
for the purpose of Awareness Training and Exercise Development extending
the length of the Contract from October 31, 2004, to June 30, 2005; and
authorize the Chairperson to sign, contingent upon the appropriate
signatures being obtained. Motion
carried unanimously,
with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
| Auditor/Maximus
Contract
|
The
County Administrator explained that the Auditor had requested he relay to
the Board that the request to ratify was based on the date of the Contract
and that no charges have yet been incurred against this contract.
Moved by Supervisor Williams and seconded by Supervisor Arcularius
to ratify and approve the Contract between the County of Inyo and Maximus,
Inc., for the preparation of the FY 2004-05 SB90 State Mandated Costs
Claim, for the period of July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005, in an amount
not to exceed $15,900; and authorize the Chairperson to sign contingent
upon the appropriate signatures being obtained.
Motion
carried unanimously,
with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
| Auditor/PRM
Contract
|
The
County Administrator echoed his previous remarks in that the ratification
of this contract is also based on the date and that no charges have yet
been incurred against this contract.
Moved by Supervisor Arcularius and seconded by Supervisor Williams
to ratify and approve the Contract between the County of Inyo and Public
Resource Management Group (PRM) for the preparation of the FY 2004-05
Countywide Cost Plan for use in FY 2005-06, for the period of July 1,
2004, through June 30, 2005, in an amount not to exceed $6,000; and
authorize the Chairperson to sign, contingent upon the appropriate
signatures being obtained. Motion
carried unanimously,
with Supervisor Bear absent.
|
| Water
Dept. Org. Structure
|
The County Administrator and
the Board reviewed the information provided regarding the Water Department
organization structure, with the County Administrator explaining the
time-line established for action regarding the structure.
He explained that action regarding this item was scheduled for the
November 2, 2004, Board Meeting and that the information provided today
was to give the Board another opportunity to make any further changes to
the recommendations. Supervisor
Williams requested that the word vegetation be included in the Job
Description for Water Director to better explain that both water and
vegetation are monitored.
|
| BofS/TOT
and TUT Fact Sheet
|
The
County Administrator reviewed the updated fact sheets on the proposed
increases in the Transactions and Use Tax (TUT) and the Transient
Occupancy Tax (TOT). He
highlighted that the TOT Fact Sheet has been amended to reflect the
Board’s actions that should the TOT pass, the Board would reconsider the
County’s fee schedule for campgrounds to ensure that the County’s
rates coincide with any increase. The
County Administrator also informed the Board that the Fact Sheets would be
placed on the County’s web page.
|
| Board
Members and Staff Reports
|
The
Board Members reported on their activities during the preceding week,
including constituent meetings, an RCRC legislative update, the
Independence Candidate’s night, the Local Transportation Commission
Meeting, a Mental Health Board Meeting wherein it was learned that the
Mono County Residential Treatment facility is being closed and Inyo
County’s clients will now have to be treated at the Carson/Tahoe
facility, and a Northern Inyo Airport Advisory Board meeting.
Supervisor Hambleton informed the Board that he had been contacted
by Mayor Hahn’s office and a meeting has been scheduled in Los Angeles
with the Mayor, the County Administrator and himself, on November 8, 2004.
The County Administrator informed the Board that he had taken the
opportunity to provide information to the landfill users regarding the TUT.
He said that as a result of a couple of phone calls regarding a
perception that the County might be attempting to influence the outcome of
the election, he had personally paid for the reproductions costs for the
flyers and had immediately ceased having the information provided.
He explained that he wanted the Board to be aware of what had
transpired and to know that he had instigated the information process with
the best of intentions. Supervisor
Arcularius and the County Administrator updated the Board on Sierra
Business Council (SBC) Meetings which they had attended regarding the
airports, clarifying that while the SBC indicated that the original Inyo
2020 Forum cost the County $120,000, in actuality the actual cash outlay
of County funds was only between $10,000 and $15,000.
|
|
Public
Comment
|
At the conclusion of the Board Members and Staff
Reports the Chairperson opened public comment to recognize two late
arrivals to the meeting who wanted to address the Water Department
organizational structure discussion.
Ms. Nicole Schober addressed the Board to stress the importance of
leaving the Water Department as an autonomous department, to make
recommendations on how to provide legal representation for the department
and to suggest how the Board could notify the public of the good job the
Board was doing. Ms. Ellen Hardebeck asked if the November 2, 2004, item
regarding the Water Department organizational structure could be a timed
item. The County
Administrator informed the Board and the audience that the item would be
scheduled for 10:05 a.m.
|
| Closed
Session
|
The
Chairperson recessed open session at 2:05 p.m., to convene in closed
session to discuss Agenda Items No. 19.
CONFERENCE
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING/ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a)(c) – One Case -
2004-2005 Annual Operations Plan Dispute
between LADWP and County of Inyo, Adjudication of Dispute Pursuant
to the Long Term Water Agreement entered June 1997 as Stipulation and
Order for Judgment, Inyo County Superior Court, Case No. 12908; No. 20.
PERSONNEL (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957) - Public
Employee Appointment - Title: Acting Water Department Director; and No.
20A. PERSONNEL (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957)– Public
Employee Appointment - Title - Director of Environmental Health.
|
| Report
on Closed Session
|
The
Chairperson recessed closed session at 5:25 p.m., to reconvene in open
session to receive a report on closed session.
County Counsel reported there were no items discussed in closed
session, which were required by law to be reported on in open session.
|
| Adjournment
|
The
Chairperson adjourned the regular meeting at 5:25 p.m., to 9:00 a.m.,
November 2, 2004, in the Board of Supervisors Room, at the County
Administrative Center, in Independence.
|
________________________________________
Chairperson, Inyo County Board of
Supervisors
Attest:
RENÉ
L. MENDEZ
Clerk of the Board
|